“And when Abner was returned to Hebron, Joab took him aside in the gate to speak with him quietly and smote him there under the fifth rib, that he died, for the blood of Asahel his brother.”
Context:To understand the significance of this verse, it’s important to consider the broader context of the passage. In 2 Samuel 3, we read about the aftermath of the civil war between the house of Saul and the house of David. Abner, who was the commander of Saul’s army, had defected to David’s side. However, there was still tension and resentment between Abner and Joab, who was David’s commander.
Abner’s return to Hebron:Hebron was the temporary capital of David’s kingdom, and Abner had recently returned there after making a covenant with David to bring the northern tribes of Israel under his rule. Abner’s intention was to help unify the kingdom of Israel under one king.
The conversation between Joab and Abner:Joab, who was known for his hot temper and loyalty to David, took the opportunity to have a private conversation with Abner at the city gate. It is unclear what exactly they discussed, but Joab may have been suspicious of Abner’s motives and felt threatened by his increasing influence.
Joab’s act of revenge:During their conversation, Joab struck Abner under the fifth rib, which resulted in Abner’s death. Joab’s motivation for killing Abner was primarily personal and driven by a desire for revenge. Abner had previously killed Joab’s brother, Asahel, in battle (2 Samuel 2:23), and Joab saw this as an opportunity to avenge his brother’s death.
David’s response:When David heard about Abner’s death, he publicly disavowed any involvement or knowledge of the incident. He mourned Abner’s death and even composed a lament, expressing his grief and acknowledging Abner’s abilities as a mighty warrior and leader.
Consequences and repercussions:Joab’s act of killing Abner had significant consequences. David publicly pronounced a curse on Joab and his descendants, holding Joab accountable for the bloodshed and the violation of sanctuary in which the murder took place (2 Samuel 3:28-29). This event further strained the relationship between David and Joab.
Key Lessons from 2 Samuel 3:27:
- Revenge and personal vendettas can lead to destructive actions and perpetuate cycles of violence.
- Honesty and integrity are important qualities for leaders, as David distanced himself from Joab’s actions.
- The consequences of our actions, even in the pursuit of justice, can have far‑reaching effects on ourselves and those around us.
It’s essential to remember that the Bible presents these events as part of a historical narrative and does not necessarily condone or endorse every action described. Instead, it offers valuable lessons and insights into human nature, choices, and consequences.
