1 Samuel 20:27

And it came to pass on the morrow, which was the second day of the month, that David’s place was empty: and Saul said unto Jonathan his son, Wherefore cometh not the son of Jesse to meat, neither yesterday, nor to day?

1 Samuel 20:27 (KJV)

Context

This verse takes place during a royal feast at the new moon, when key members of Saul’s court were expected to be present. David, who had served in Saul’s court, is absent for the second day. Saul notices the empty place and asks Jonathan why “the son of Jesse” has not come to eat.

Earlier, Jonathan had recognized David as God’s anointed future king, and they made a solemn covenant of friendship. Saul, however, had become jealous of David’s popularity and God’s favor on him. Jonathan and David devised a plan to test Saul’s intentions. They agreed that if Saul reacted calmly, David would be safe; if angrily, David’s suspicions would be confirmed. Saul’s question on the second day reveals his growing hostility.

Meaning

Saul’s use of “the son of Jesse” is significant. He avoids David’s name, using a dismissive phrase that shows his alienation. The timing also matters: David’s absence was not a one-time oversight but a deliberate pattern, increasing the weight of the moment.

Saul’s question sets the stage for Jonathan’s defense of David and Saul’s angry response, which escalates the conflict. This passage shows how sin and jealousy distort relationships, leading to suspicion and confrontation. It also shows the cost of faithfulness: David’s loyalty to God and his covenant with Jonathan put him at odds with the king.

Biblical connections

The tension between Saul and David continues a pattern seen earlier in 1 Samuel. Saul’s disobedience led to God’s rejection of his kingship (1 Samuel 15:26). David’s anointing by Samuel (1 Samuel 16:13) marked him as the chosen successor, and Saul’s jealousy grew as David prospered. This verse shows human opposition to God’s plan, yet it also points to God’s providence in protecting David.

Application

This verse reminds us to discern the intentions and attitudes of others, as Jonathan did. It is essential to have trustworthy friends who support us in difficulty. The passage also encourages us to remain steadfast in faith, trusting God’s plans even when facing opposition.

Obedience to God may sometimes lead to conflict with earthly authorities or social expectations. David’s absence was not disrespect but a necessary step to preserve his life. We may face similar choices where faithfulness to God requires going against those in power.

Reflection

Consider how jealousy can blind us to truth, as it did for Saul. His suspicion made him see a faithful servant as an enemy. Reflect on your own relationships: are there areas where suspicion or envy has clouded your judgment? Ask God to give you a heart that seeks truth and values godly friendship, even when circumstances are tense.