Romans 9:13

As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

Romans 9:13 (KJV)

Paul quotes Malachi 1:2-3 to confirm the principle he has just drawn from the story of Isaac’s twin sons. In Romans 9:10-12, he recalls that God told Rebekah, before the children were born and before they had done good or evil, “The elder shall serve the younger.” That word to Rebekah established that God’s purpose in election stands “not of works, but of him that calleth.” Now, in Romans 9:13, Paul adds a second witness from the prophet Malachi: “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”

The quotation from Malachi is introduced with the formula “As it is written,” Paul’s standard way of citing the Old Testament as authoritative Scripture. The words come from Malachi 1:2-3, where God declares to Israel, “I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Is not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith the LORD: yet I have loved Jacob, and I have hated Esau.” The contrast between Jacob and Esau is covenantal language, not a statement of personal emotional hostility. In this context, “hate” signifies a relational distinction within divine election—God’s preference for Jacob and his descendants, Israel, over Esau and his descendants, Edom. The choice was made before the twins were born, apart from their works, and it was rooted in God’s sovereign will and purpose.

The Genesis account of Jacob and Esau (Genesis 25:19-34) supplies the historical background. Esau, the older twin, was expected to receive the family blessing by the custom of primogeniture, yet God declared that the elder would serve the younger. Paul’s point is that God’s choice was not based on human merit, ancestry, or effort. He continues in Romans 9:14-16, “Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.” The quotation from Malachi reinforces this truth: God’s purposes in redemptive history are established by his own will, not by human works.

This passage teaches that God has the right to choose according to his divine plan. It must be understood within its context to avoid misinterpretation. Paul’s main point is to highlight God’s sovereignty and mercy, not to portray God as arbitrary or unjust. The doctrine of election is meant to humble the believer and to magnify God’s grace. Since salvation does not depend on human will or effort, no one can boast before God. The proper response is trust in God’s wisdom and gratitude for his mercy.

Romans 9:13 calls believers to recognize that God’s choices are rooted in mercy, not in human merit. The love and hatred spoken of here are expressions of God’s sovereign favor and disfavor toward nations and individuals in his redemptive plan. Rather than speculating about the destiny of Esau, the believer is invited to rest in the certainty that God’s purposes are good and just. His election is not a cause for fear but for worship, because it reveals that salvation from beginning to end depends on God, who shows mercy according to his own wise and holy will.

Previous Post
Ezekiel 8:10
Next Post
Romans 9:20