1 Chronicles 27:12

The ninth captaine for the ninth moneth, was Abiezer the Anetothite, of the Beniamites: and in his course were twentie and foure thousand. 1 Chronicles 27:12 (KJV)

The ninth

captain for the ninth month

was Abiezer the Anetothite, of the Benjamites: and in his course

were twenty and four thousand. 1 Chronicles 27:12 (KJV)

This verse belongs to a larger passage that records the captains of the monthly military divisions in the army of King David. David organized Israel’s forces into twelve divisions, each assigned to serve during a specific month of the year, thereby ensuring a steady and orderly rotation of troops.

The ninth captain named in the list is Abiezer the Anetothite, who came from the tribe of Benjamin. Benjamin was one of the twelve tribes of Israel and was noted throughout Scripture for producing brave warriors and skilled archers who played vital roles in Israel’s history.

Abiezer’s division numbered twenty‑four thousand men. Such a large contingent demonstrates the considerable size and strength of the forces mobilized for the ninth month, which corresponds to the month of Chislev in the Hebrew calendar. The figure also reflects the thoroughness of David’s military administration.

From a historical standpoint, these enumerations of captains and their respective troops highlight the remarkable organization and might of David’s army. They provide valuable insight into the military system, logistical planning, and administrative structure that undergirded Israel’s defense during David’s reign.

While the passage does not convey a direct theological doctrine, it serves as an important part of Scripture that helps readers appreciate the historical and cultural backdrop of the Israelites. The verse subtly underscores enduring biblical themes such as the importance of godly leadership, disciplined organization, and unity among God’s people.

As with any biblical text, reading this verse in the broader context of the surrounding chapters deepens our understanding of its significance and allows us to see how it fits into the larger narrative of Israel’s development under King David.